Saturday, December 31, 2011

Satyr Taxis

Fantasy ornament designs (1550s) by Cornelis Bos
- image captions below are translated/edited.
A bit.


Wagen getrokken door twee fantasiedieren...1550
Chariot of grotesques and scrollwork drawn by two fantasy animals and pushed by a satyr, whose head is trapped in a large shell. A satyr is in the car with a lighted lamp. [I]n print series of eight chariots of grotesques and scrollwork with satyrs, animals and various other creatures; decorated with trophies, garlands and vines. [1550]



Voor op de wagen staat een sater...1550
Chariot of grotesques and scrollwork (series title).

Chariot pulled by a fantasy beast (?like a goat) -- the chariot has a seated woman and four satyrs, one of the satyrs on the front of the car is holding a mask in his hand, without a name. [1550]



Voorop zit een man met een lans...1552
Frieze with chariots of grotesques and roll and fittings work with figures and animals, decorated with garlands and vines (series title)

Car containing a woman, pushed by a man and pulled by a man riding on the back of a bear. A man with a lance sits in the front. Behind the back of the woman is a monkey. Belongs to series of 4 prints. [1552]



De wagen wordt getrokken door...1552
Frieze with chariots of grotesques and roll and fittings work with figures and animals, decorated with garlands and vines (series title) [1552]

The car is pulled by two men and a goat, which runs between them. Belongs to series of 4 prints.



De wagen wordt voortbewogen...1550
Chariot of grotesques and scrollwork (series title)

The car is propelled by three satyrs with saucer-shaped chins. [From a] series of eight chariots of grotesques and scrollwork with satyrs, animals and various other creatures, decorated with trophies, garlands and vines. [1550]



De constructie rust op een schildpad...1550
The structure rests on a turtle. [From a] series of eight chariots of grotesques and scrollwork with satyrs, animals and various other creatures, decorated with trophies, garlands and vines. [1550]



De wagen wordt getrokken door...1550
A man and woman are seated in a car pulled by a satyr and pushed by two men, all caught in the frame. [From a] series of eight chariots of grotesques and scrollwork with satyrs, animals and various other creatures, decorated with trophies, garlands and vines.




De wagen beweegt voort over water...1550
The vehicle is moved through the water by a paddle wheel. Two satyrs pull, two women push. [From a] series of eight chariots of grotesques and scrollwork with satyrs, animals and various other creatures, decorated with trophies, garlands and vines.



De vrouw zit in een lus van rolwerk...1552
The woman sits in a loop of scrollwork in a cart pushed by 2 men. A woman riding on a deer leads the way. [1550]



Achter de schildpad zit een vrouw...1552
Frieze with chariots of grotesques and roll and fittings work with figures and animals, decorated with garlands and vines (series title)

Behind the turtle is a woman with a stick. Another woman holds a dog's ears in front of her. The car is pushed by a dog and two men. Belongs to series of 4 prints. [1552]



De voorste sater loopt tussen...1550
The front satyr runs between two plates. [From a] series of eight chariots of grotesques and scrollwork with satyrs, animals and various other creatures, decorated with trofeeëen, garlands and vines.



Achterop zitten drie saters... 1550
Three satyrs with heads and hands locked in the rear bogie. A male sits under a trellis in the vehicle. The chariot is pulled by 2 bulls and a satyr. [From a] series of eight chariots of grotesques and scrollwork with satyrs, animals and various other creatures, decorated with trophies, garlands and vines. [1550]



Bacchus 1600 to 1699
2-part picture. A procession in honor of the god Bacchus who sits in a chariot. And a procession to the temple with his satyrs and putti and others elated with feasting and dancing. Some play on flutes and tambourines, others carrying sticks or jars with grapes and vines with them.




In the absence of a handy academic storyline to explain the hallucinogenic excesses of **mannerist** ornament, I'm choosing to believe that this array of 'transport' is the mid-16th century equivalent of a bloated movie franchise: the one sequel too many inadvertently became a parody of itself.

These designs are essentially riffing on a seminal technological, artistic and mythological motif from throughout recorded history: the chariot, which was first developed in the Middle East in about 2000 to 3000 BC.
"The chariot, driven by a charioteer, was used for ancient warfare during the bronze and the iron ages. Armor was limited to a shield. The vehicle was used for travel and in processions, games, and races after it had been superseded by other vehicles for military purposes." [W]

"One of the culminating battles of chariotry came early in the 13th century B.C., when armies of the Hittites and Egyptians clashed on the plains of northern Syria at Kadesh. Muwatallis II, the Hittite king, deployed a force of 3,500 chariots, and Ramses II is supposed to have countered in kind, but the battle seems to have ended in a stalemate. By the end of that century, as armies learned to blunt the attacks with swarming infantry and later cavalry, the age of the chariot as a weapon drew to a close. The high-speed vehicle was reduced to roles in sport and regal parades." [source]

For the sake of brevity we fast forward to Roman times when the ceremony of the Roman Triumph (sanctification of military honour) involved parading of the celebrated hero through the city streets on a chariot. This would seem to be the true origin for the establishment of the chariot as an important iconographic symbol for elevating/feting/honouring/celebrating either man or God in drama and art (mythological in particular : see the final image, pertaining to Bacchus, above).

The chariot, as a symbolic cultural element, followed various paths down through history, from the pageantry and Joyous Entries associated with the festivals of the 16th/17th centuries to parodies in Fractured Fairytale cartoons in the 1960s, by way of polar examples.

My personal view - apply skepticism as necessary - is that the designs above by Cornelis Bos are much less concerned with adding to the visual language of pageantry (or even ornament) than they are with satirising the Renaissance festival culture itself. Ornament that once adorned the embellished chariots and floats of the festival scene has come alive here not as secondary decoration but as the primary focus. The abstracted grotesque figures and mythological details propel our 'taxis' - the almost irrelevant, bizarre land and water transport frames - forward.

Doubtless, art historians would observe these ornamental fantasies and line up to expand on the projected meanings from analysis of allegorical features and symbology. They are welcome to it. I prefer to see the simple, humorous mockery of artistic forebears by the emerging talents of a new movement. Mannerist Fractured Fairytales, if you will.

17 comments:

  1. The 2-part picture must be inspired of, or maybe a reproduction of, Maerten van Heemskercks painting on the same theme. Great post as usual!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks. I'm certain you are correct. Giulio Romano was also involved in the design history: he was a pupil of Raphael's and produced an important series on 'Triumphs' in the early-mid Renaissance.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yeah, I see what you mean. They're kind of like the Renaissance version of Rube Goldberg's machines.

    But they remind me of a lot of art nowadays, which seems to base itself off of the random motions of the mind -- or doodles -- and makes something a lot more complex or interesting out of them.

    Anyway, it also strikes a chord with a fantasy I had as a kid. I could imagine somebody saying, "You know, when I go out in a car, I want it to be a car. But I want, like, a whole *garden* for my car!"

    Unfortunately, I didn't have that kind of taste as a kid. And what I would say was, "But I want, like, a whole *McDonald's* for my car!"

    ReplyDelete
  4. Pure whimsy. It would be a disservice to try to read too much into it symbol-wise.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Whimsy! Yes, that's the word I was looking for. Thank you. I'm a bit torn about the symbolism though. There's a long and deep history that's being lampooned here; some level of understanding (and I fully admit I only skated over a tiny bit of it) is needed to 'get the joke(s)', I daresay.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Whimsy? More trippy I think. Whimsy implies a certain light heartedness and this work has definite sinister overtones/ dark night of the soul sort of thing. I feel certain there were drugs involved. How else to explain these "hallucinogenic excesses"?

    (I think of movie franchises as motivated by the money men at the studios.)

    Fascinating. Thanks so much.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Happy New year Mr Peacay and thanks so much to be always here !
    :-)patricia

    ReplyDelete
  8. Merci Patricia! J'espère que vous avez une belle 2012.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Yes, exactly! Re: "Ornament that once adorned the embellished chariots and floats of the festival scene has come alive here not as secondary decoration but as the primary focus. The abstracted grotesque figures and mythological details propel our 'taxis' - the almost irrelevant, bizarre land and water transport frames - forward."

    Well-considered and phrased!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Wonderful post! Thank you for sharing such amazing images

    ReplyDelete
  11. 虽然我不是很懂英文,但是看到这些图片的时候,还是很震惊,作者你太有才了,我很喜欢这些风格的图片

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thanks for that.
    TRANSLATION: "Although I do not really understand English, but when I see these pictures, when still very shocked, you are too talented author, I like the style of the picture"

    ReplyDelete
  13. I'd say there's an ongoing theme of satyr-bondage here, which I suppose isn't utterly surprising if Giulio Romano was involved.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Another aspect that I believe might have motivated a lot of the fantastic elements of these prints, and all strapwork related imagery, was the newly rediscovered interest in the description of pure form brought about by the many guides to perspective that had blossomed around this time. I think artists began to "doodle" in 3D forms, and once they had described the form, began to fill it in with whatever might come to mind, including myth, nature, and grottesca gleaned from various sources. The satirical and dark aspect of these is clearly intended, possibly from the view that it would sell the prints, and balance out their dry scientific exploration of pure space.

    ReplyDelete
  15. That's an interesting theory. I suppose I tend more towards believing that there was an overall ripe environment that included perspective theory, transition from Renaissance to Mannerist artforms, improvements in engraving techniques PLUS (still, to me, most importantly) the existence of the Festival culture. But I do like that idea of doodling in 3D space as something of an absurdity-generator!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Absolutely only one aspect of the program that created these images. Thanks as always for your illuminating and delightful posts! I also know, as a fellow obsessive downloader, how much work you put into collecting and collating these images- so thanks again!

    ReplyDelete
  17. I found this post while doing some extensive searching for images of the minor Roman gods Pamona and Vertumnus (gods of orchards, gardens, plants, etc). I'm wondering if they are included in this depiction -- especially the one where "a man and woman are seated in a car pulled by a satyr"...

    ReplyDelete

Comments are all moderated so don't waste your time spamming: they will never show up.

If you include ANY links that aren't pertinent to the blog post or discussion they will be deleted and a rash will break out in your underwear.

Also: please play the ball and not the person.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.